![]() Only near his death, inġ955, did be become, like Apollinaire, a culture hero. Had but a handful of poems in little magazines. Year apart, Stevens in 1879 and Apollinaire in 1880, one could hardlyĬall them contemporaries. Pierre Bourdieu's Postface to his translation of Panofsky's Architecture et penseeĪn effort of abstraction that we can see what unifies them. For a brilliant discussion of Panofsky's method as a structuralist, see It is only throughġ Erwin Panofsky, "Iconography and Iconology," in Meaning in the VisualĢ Ibid. How do we know, then, that Stevens and Apollinaire should beĬompared? We perceive at once what separates them. Methodological circle which we must accept if we forego massive evidence, and try to prove the truth of a parallelism by the truths which "It corrects the interpretation of an individual work of art by a 'history of style' which in turnĬan only be built up by interpreting individual works."2 Such is the Treating its composition, its themes, and ev en its materials "as symptoms of 'symbolical values' which are often unknown to the artist himself and may even emphatically differ from what he intended to express."' Iconology is a structural science. Iconography, apprehends the intrinsic meaning of a work of art by It mutilated meaning by considering only a part of meaning: themes, images, myths. Now Erwin Panofsky showed what was wrong with Long time, comparative literature resembled the positivistic science of In a poem beyond what the author meant it to mean, as soon as its inspiring influence has been exposed, all its meaning vanishes. Indeed conscious influenceįunctions the same way as conscious intention. MassiveĮvidence of one poet's influence on another must be handled gingerly. HERE IS NO massive evidence to link Wallace Stevens with This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Sat, 22:19:41 UTCĪll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.įor more information about JSTOR, please contact of Oregon and Duke University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at Published by: Duke University Press on behalf of the University of Oregon Maybe they could combine the two and build an app that lets you vote on farts. He points to iVote, which let you vote on topics and see the results. "All I knew was that a lot of people would be getting iPhones and iPod Touch MP3 players on Christmas Day.”Ĭomm is quick to point out that his company, InfoMedia, has high-brow applications as well. “I had a hunch that Christmas Eve and Christmas Day would be higher," Comm wrote in his blog. But even we were a little surprised at such sophomoric success. We can appreciate all of you who think farts are funny. On Christmas Day alone, there were reportedly 38,927 downloads. Everything from ' Jack the Ripper' to 'Howard the Duck.' Their marketing tag line is the fart machine for all ages.ĭeveloper Joel Comm has already cashed in on flatulence to the iTune of nearly $10,000 a day. It is exactly what it sounds (and smells) like. We couldn't pass on the opportunity to tell you about the hottest-selling iPhone application, iFart.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |